Well folks, another year has come to a close. Like 2020, I spent most of 2021 hunkered down in front of my computer doing research, trying to forget the craziness of the outside world. The result was over 150,000 words spilled on this blog.
Before I get to the top posts of the year, I thought I’d briefly discuss my writing process. Since I started this blog, the trend has been for me to write more long-form content. In 2019, my posts averaged 2,200 words each. By 2020, that was up to 2,900 words. This past year, the average post was 3,700 words — the length of a short scientific paper.
While I admire writers like Cory Doctorow who are able to pump out rapid-fire commentary, that’s not me. I think slowly (at least when thinking in words). I am also not a natural writer.
Noam Chomsky claims to have an incessant stream of words running through his head. And based on his prolific writing, I don’t doubt him. But my brain rarely contains words. Instead, it mostly contains pictures. For that reason, the majority of my posts are written around charts. I make the figures first, usually quickly and with great enjoyment. Then I start what is for me the more difficult task: explaining to other people what I have done.
I’ve been told that I am good at explaining complicated analysis. And if that is true, it may be because I am not a fast writer. It’s rare for me to see the path from A to B the first time through. Usually the writing path emerges only after many failed attempts have been eliminated.
Case in point was this year’s most popular post, ‘The Truth About Inflation’. As usual, I did the analysis quickly based on pictures that popped in my head. But the commentary came together only after much trial and error. Fortunately, the result seems to have struck a chord.
And speaking of chord striking, I am always surprised about which posts are popular and which posts are duds. Here were the 10 most-read posts of 2021:
- The Truth About Inflation
- The Rise of Human Capital Theory
- The Deep History of Human Inequality
- Radically Progressive Degrowth: Reducing Resource Use by Eliminating Inequality
- How the Labor Theory of Value Emerges from Egalitarianism
- The Ritual of Capitalization
- Free Speech For Me, Not You
- Living the Good Life in a Non-Growth World: Investigating the Role of Hierarchy (Part 2)
- The Half Life of a Spotify Hit
- Living the good life in a non-growth world: Investigating the role of hierarchy
Thanks for reading Economics from the Top Down this year. I have loads of content planned for 2022. (Many of the charts are already made, and are waiting for me to start the slow task of explaining them.)
Thank-you also to my patrons. Your generosity shows that paywalls are not the only way to earn a living.
Support this blog
Economics from the Top Down is where I share my ideas for how to create a better economics. If you liked this post, consider becoming a patron. You’ll help me continue my research, and continue to share it with readers like you.
Sign up to get email updates from this blog.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. You can use/share it anyway you want, provided you attribute it to me (Blair Fix) and link to Economics from the Top Down.
I recommend reading The Dawn of Everything by Davids Wengrow and Graeber which expands the 2018 article you cited in Deep History of Inequality
Yes, I’m looking forward to reading that book.
I don’t recommend reading “The Dawn of Everything” because it is a biased disingenuous account of human history (https://www.persuasion.community/p/a-flawed-history-of-humanity ) that spreads fake hope (the authors of “The Dawn” claim human history has not “progressed” in stages, or linearly, and must not end in inequality and hierarchy as with our current system… so there’s hope for us now that it could get different/better again). As a result of this fake hope porn it has been widely praised. It conveniently serves the profoundly sick industrialized world of fakes and criminals. The book’s dishonest fake grandiose title shows already that this work is a FOR-PROFIT, instead a FOR-TRUTH, endeavor geared at the (ignorant gullible) masses.
Fact is human history has “progressed” by and large in linear stages, especially since the dawn of agriculture (www.focaalblog.com/2021/12/22/chris-knight-wrong-about-almost-everything ). This “progress” has been fundamentally destructive and is driven and dominated by “The 2 Married Pink Elephants In The Historical Room” (www.rolf-hefti.com/covid-19-coronavirus.html ) which the fake hope-giving authors of “The Dawn” entirely ignore, naturally (no one can you write a legitimate human history without understanding the nature of humans). And these two married pink elephants are the reason why we’ve been “stuck” in a destructive hierarchy, and will be into the foreseeable future.
A good example that one of the authors, Graeber, has no real idea what world we’ve been living in and about the nature of humans is his last brief article on Covid where his ignorance shines bright already at the title of his article, “After the Pandemic, We Can’t Go Back to Sleep.” Apparently he doesn’t know that most people WANT to be asleep, and that they’ve been wanting that for thousands of years (and that’s not the only ignorant notion in the title). Yet he (and his partner) is the sort of person who thinks he can teach you something authentically truthful about human history and whom you should be trusting along those terms. Ridiculous!
“The Dawn” is just another fantasy, or ideology, cloaked in a hue of cherry-picked “science,” served lucratively to the gullible ignorant underclasses.
I’ve approved your comment, Maxi, although I’m not sure that this is the proper venue for a rant against Graeber’s writing.
Are you envious of his salesmanship?
“you”= Maxi, “his” = Graeber’s
Hi Blair, I have used your charts (I am a chart and atlas kind of guy) in some of my own essays. I link to your entry with attribution, but is there some protocol you would prefer?
Hi John. Linking is fine. If you want to write up a bibliography entry, that’s great … but not necessary.